Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are both common and difficult to differentiate. Because both are distinct conditions with contrasting treatment strategies, distinguishing between the two is essential in patients who present with symptoms that generate clinical suspicion.
Diagnosis and monitoring Test menu
Calprotectin, an indirect marker of intestinal inflammation, is a first-line testing option that can help differentiate between IBD and IBS.
Key testing
Advantages
Highlights
The differential diagnosis for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). While the clinical presentation is similar, IBD is an inflammatory disease, while IBS is a noninflammatory disease. View this "Hot Topic" to learn about testing for IBD and IBS.
Serologic testing for IBD is only used when diagnosis made through flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy with mucosal biopsies and radiographic studies doesn't clearly differentiate between ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Our data-driven serology panel examines only the characteristic patterns of antibodies with demonstrated clinical utility, including:
Key testing
Advantages
Highlights
In this test specific episode of the "Answers From the Lab" podcast, Melissa Snyder, Ph.D., explains how IBDP2, when used after first-line testing has failed, can distinguish between ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.
A focus on mucosal healing reduces the need for steroids and risk of hospitalization and surgery. Unfortunately, complete mucosal healing can be hard to achieve, and agreement has not yet been reached on how much improvement is required for better outcomes.
The CALM trial1 from 2018 found that an approach geared toward reducing inflammatory markers of calprotectin and serum c-reactive protein, in addition to symptom reduction in patients with Crohn’s disease, improved mucosal healing and led to better clinical and endoscopic outcomes than a conventional approach.
Key testing
Advantages